The scope of this challenge is to check the fitness for use of the current available marine datasets to monitor any oil spill over the Black Sea*, including the spill trajectory, environmental and coastal impacts* within 24, and 72 hours after the accident, or to indicate gaps in the current EU data collection framework.
* the statistical likelihood that sensitive coastal habitats or species or tourist beaches will be affected
This activity of the EU BlackSea checkpoint project (DG MARE contract n° EASME/EMFF/2014/18.104.22.168/LOT4/SI2.709436) has been executed during the 2015-2018 period of time.The methodology used is identical to all challenges
- Perform a literature survey to identify state of the art activities related to the use case and clarify the landscape of monitoring data covering the BlackSea,
- Specify needs for production of the product,
- Evaluate the adequacy of monitoring data, that is the availability and appropriateness.
The team participating in the challenge is:
Two products have been requested by the call, consecutive impacts bulletins at 24 and 72 hours after the declaration of the accident.The products are listed and accessible from the table given below. All products are representative of the following declaration of the accident. Each bulletin includes simulation results as spatio-temporal graphics with confidence limits as well as quality assessments indicators and expert reports.
10 May 2016 – Declaration of an oil spill accident
The position of the oil spill coincides with a blowout of a pipeline located on the seabed at the depth of 50 meters at position LAT = 44°.2494 N, LON = 29°. 47508E. The overall amount of oil released is set to 300m3 crude oil released during a period of 2 days.
Note here that the date of declaration of accidents for the plot platform leak simulation was common to all EMODnet checkpoint activities.
|Number||Name and Specification of product||Access to product||Confidence limits|
|Product 01||Oil Platform Leak Bulletin released on 11 May 2016, fast release, 24h after the incident declared on 10th May 2016 by DG MARE||Access our monitoring and impact bulletin releasing information on
||Good: meets less than 50% of the scope of the Targeted Product (see our appropriateness criteria)|
|http://doi.org/10.12770/afe6963f-d907-44ec-a4ee-bfd9a4af5aec to get a full description, quality information, and citation.|
|Product 02||Oil Platform Leak Bulletin released on 13 May 2016, fast release, 72h after the incident declared on 10th May 2016 by DG MARE||
Access our monitoring and impact bulletin supplemented by
|Very good: meets more than 70% of the scope of the Targeted Product (see our appropriateness criteria)|
|http://doi.org/10.12770/67a2c0a9-0a91-476f-b581-b6c35a5db945 to get a full description, quality information, and citation.|
Sample of the bulletin is given below:
The bulletin currently is built upon the University of Liege hydrodynamic forecasting products and the high temporal SKIRON winds forecast and the new CYCOFOS waves in the Black Sea, all free available on-line.
The Lagrangian oil spill model MEDSLIK is applied to calculate the slick trajectory using the 6-hr surface currents and SST from the University of Liege Black Sea Forecast System, 1-hr SKIRON wind fields, and 3-hr new CYCOFOS waves (see http://www.seamod.ro).
After 24 hr from the accident, the 65.23% of the total released oil drifts to North/North-East following wind and sea currents, without any impact at the coastal zone. After 72 hr from the accident, it is expected that 59.51% of the total released oil will be located at the sea surface 72 hours after the reported incident. The oil at the surface is transported following the direction of winds and of the sea current and is not expected to impact the coastal zone even after 72 hours. The oil spill has been transported far away from the location of the incident though, one day after the oil release from the pipeline has been stopped. Despite the fact that the source of the oil spill located on the seabed, the amount of the dispersed oil constitutes a small fraction 4.5%. This is due mainly to the fact that the location of the subsurface source of the oil spill was at shallow water, i.e. at 50 m and the oil rise the surface very quickly. Moreover, the weak subsurface sea currents in the area of the oil spill source case an insignificant diversion of the oil plume from the vertical axis to the North-East, as the dominant sea currents.
- Read our expert evaluation report to get to get feedback on the appropriateness of upstream data used in product realization,
- And read integrated reports to find out all our assessment feedback on the project checkpoint
- The Literature Survey: to discover all upstream data and possible uses
- The first Data Adequacy Report to get feedback on the stress test on availability* of all referenced data sets
- The second data Adequacy report for full feedback on availability and appropriateness of all used data sets, of all challenges.
The EMODnet Black Sea Checkpoint practical outputs are the results of the assessment exercise carried out by the so-called “challenges” specified by the call for tenders n° MARE/2014/09 aiming at determining how well the input data from the observing and monitoring systems existing at the sea basin scale fit the user needs to develop them.
This product and any resultant data produced is a consequence of these tests and provided on an “as is” basis. The information contained in the data products and in the descriptions (metadata) of the input data and of the data products making use of them is believed to be trustworthy. However, its completeness, consistency, accuracy, and usability cannot be guaranteed. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure its reliability within the limits of present knowledge, no responsibility can be accepted by those involved in its compilation or publication for any consequential loss or damage arising from its use.
The producer disclaims any and all warranties, conditions, or representations (express, implied, oral or written), relating to the Product or any part thereof, including, without limitation, any and all implied warranties of quality, performance, suitability or fitness for a particular purpose to the full extent permitted by law. The Producer accepts no liability for loss suffered or incurred as a result of reliance on the Product or any output of its use. The Producer shall not be liable for any economic loss, loss of profit, loss of business or contract, depletion of goodwill or otherwise, in each case whether direct, or indirect or any indirect loss whatsoever (howsoever caused) including loss or damage suffered as a result of an action brought by any person which arise out of or in connection with the use of the Product or inability to use the Product.